Thursday, November 09, 2006

He's more machine now than man... twisted and evil.

I have formulated eight subgroups of cyborgs represented in popular fictional media, in order as they get progressively less organic.

1) Traditional Organic- Although the most controversial by traditional standards, many people including Donna Haraway consider anything that uses technology (internally or externally) may be considered a cyborg. The extent of this subgroup must be considered on a case by case basis, and is subject to individual discretion. As technically any character would fit here, it is the least rigidly constructed group.

MacGyver

2) Organic/Extensions- This group would include anyone with any type of external yet connected technology to aid them in their tasks. This can range from one or two cybernetic limbs to headgear, etc. They can share qualities of traditional organics as well.

Jax from Mortal Kombat

3) Organic/Internal Enhancements- This group includes people with more invasive technology that enhances their abilities, keep them alive, or even perhaps have control over them. This includes people with cardiac pacemakers all the way through brain implants. They may share qualities of the first two groups. The most extreme case of this is the Borg from the Star Trek franchise.

Borg Queen

4) Organic/Overtaken- The important distinction of this group is that the individual in question started as an organic being and has been modified so extensively that a vast majority of what remains is machine. Whether by choice or by necessity, these characters are usually are consumed in mind and body, struggling with their self definition.

General Grievous

5) Hybrid- May be equally Organic and machine, by natural or artificial means (either at birth, or by procedure.) Hybrids are unlike the other groups, as they are neither primarily organic nor mechanical. They have a shared 'heritage' which usually manifests itself in their behavior.

Adam from Buffy the Vampire Slayer

6) Machine/Tissue- A machine that has adopted a few organic features, such as flesh. The important distinction between this and overtaken organics is that these are primarily machines. They did not begin as organics in any sense.

The Terminator

7) Machine/Projection- These are usually humanoid representations of computer intelligence. Holograms and any 'program' in the Matrix are included here.

Agents from The Matrix

8) Traditional Robot- The bookend to the traditional organic type. This is also controversial by traditional standards. However, Machines are simply extensions of the human mind. Therefore, they possess many of our qualities and are forever connected to us.

Johnny Number Five from Short Circuit

Of course, examples such as Darth Vader are hybrids that may need further definition, or are up for interpretation. Were his mechanical parts simply an extension, were they internal and keeping him alive, or were they his bulk consuming him as Obi-Wan famously stated?

An important note is on the controversy over groups one and eight. Throughout history, we have adopted a 'self and others' mentality in which we force dichotomies were they may not in fact exist. There is a power structure and a safety mechanism in making, hard, clear distinctions. Nature and technology are completely separate. Man and machine are polar opposites. Why do we fool ourselves into this philosophy? Sure, we are made by a different process than machines, but that does not mean we are disconnected. A robot, like a building, is considered unnatural. Yet, a beehive is considered natural. Is it not a result of technology utilized by natural beings?

Top Ten

Top Ten:
10.Iron Man
09.Apocalypse
08.General Grievous
07.Adam
06.The Terminator
05.Agents
04.Borg
03.Dick Cheney
02.RoboCop

And the top Cyborg is...

01.Darth Vader

Versus

This is something I came across last week. Notice this strange face off between two heroes of cyborg fiction.

Here's an example of three different major subgroups of cyborgs in fictional media. 1) RoboCop: A man who is consumed by his mechanical parts. Like General Grievous from the Star Wars franchise, he possesses only a fraction of the organic structure he started out with. 2) Neo from the Matrix films: Although he is human, he has many ports and enhancements which allow him to 'plug into' the digital construct we perceive as reality. Whenever he is inside, what we see is not Neo himself, but a product of his mind and the processing power of that construct. Therefore, he is a cyborg in both worlds. 3) ED-209: a robot from the RoboCop franchise. This is an example of artificially intelligent robots. They may not have any organic parts in their physical selves, but they are extensions of the human mind, as they could not have been created if it was not for technology.

This is also a fine example of digital media. Not only is it posted on youtube by over forty different users and viewed thousands of times over, but the editing of already existing media is pretty impressive. Over the top, perhaps, but impressive all the same.

Enjoy.

Techno Sapiens

Now, there's an interesting thought: All of our names have been processed and made into acronyms. Does that truly make us cyborgs? How about Techno Sapiens?

Cybernetic Humanoid Responsible for Infiltration and Sabotage

CYBORGASM!: The Ecstatic Fusion of Flesh and Machine

This isn't really a blog entry. It's more of a title for an awesome five minute presentation that I will not be doing. In class.

Nonetheless, your comments are encouraged.

A Fascinating Article About Transhumanism

Dr Daedalus

Everyone should read this.

Cyborg Manifesto Detesto

I'm pretty sure I've had about all I can stand of Donna Haraway. Which is unfortunate, because I'm also pretty sure that I agree with her on cyborgism.
The perspective that the cyborg age is already happening is not foreign to me. As an avid reader of science fiction for most of my life, I feel that I've been prepared for this scenario for years. I see her points regarding the cyborg as the destroyer of the human/machine hierarchy. I see it everywhere. I see it when I think about how staplers used to look; heavy, metallic clunky things that made a lot of noise and were indispensable to a bureaucracy. Now they are these sleek, lightweight ergonomic devices, integrated into our body's design so as to minimize carpal tunnel syndrome, that function with smoothness and silence in fastening together paper, a material that, ironically, we will need less of as we press on into the cyborg/perfect stapler age.
What I find irksome is that her ideas only become lucid when expressed through interpreters, such as an interviewer, or an article about her. She is her own kind of cyborg: she is an academic fused with the technology of postmodern rhetoric. She is like The Terminator, except the The Terminator is not above presenting it's thesis in an accessible manner.
I'm no apologist for capitalism, and I do think that I agree with many of the points around which she performs her intellectual Mummenschanz, but is this lobbing of snowballs from a left-wing academic ivory tower at "phallogocentric culture" doing any good for the single mom with gender identity issues and two kids to feed? I have my doubts.
Also, I think she was remiss in not including Frank Herbert, Theodore Sturgeon, and Phillip Jose Farmer in her list of SF authors that explore gender boundaries in their fiction. But whatever.
I realize how glib all this must sound, but it is just my honest, gut reaction to the reading. I need to share it with someone, and it makes a lot more sense to do it here than to call my friends who haven't been assigned this reading and ruining their evening with my ranting. Thank you.



I am not convinced that Ms. Wildenstein is totally tragic. Perhaps what motivated her to pursue this dream; infidelity; is sad, but her specifically; I don't know. She has the money and the resources to do it. I'm sure it makes her at least as happy as the last $25 tee shirt that I bought. No one has been hurt by it. She has provided reactionary people with something to scornfully laugh at. And honestly, I find her intriguing, in a polymorphously perverse sense.

This is relevant to cyborgs. Trust me.

Friday, November 03, 2006

Cyborgs in the Military

The military is beginning to incorporate cyborgs in combat.

Links
BBC insect cyborg
Live Science shark cyborg
Robotics Trends monkey cyborg

monkey


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TK1WBA9Xl3c

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Cyborg 1.0

This article discusses experiments going on in England right now at the University of Reading. He as already experiment with a chip implanted in his arm which monitored his movement and performed tasks such as opening doors, turning on lights, and greeting him as he entered buildings.

He is now beginning more in-depth experiments by implanting more chips into his arms which will monitor and interact with his hand and arm movement. The pieces are encased in glass and communicate with computers via radio wave signals. Link

If this proves to be successful, he hopes to expand the experiment with implants in his wife.

The goal of this new experiment is to allow his hand and arm movements through programmed commands to interact with a computer and accomplish certain tasks. Therefore making life more efficient and easy.

pictures
1 2 3 4

links
kevinwarwick.com
cyborg 2.0
I, Cyborg
photo gallery

"Overriding everything, at the expense of a normal life, is Kevin's all encompassing scientific quest and desire to be a Cyborg."

Cyborg name decoder


Synthetic Electronic Assassination Neohuman

Thursday, October 12, 2006

discuss robot desire to be human and vice versa in depth.

Friday, September 22, 2006

A prayer for cyborgs...

People-

When I was a child I prayed to God for a cyborg world, while hoping that Ronnie Reagan would not deliver nuclear destruction. I was scared.

-wp